Skip to main content

Higher Educational Institutions of our Past and the Future

When Institutions that are trying to break free from the past. They also re-enforce the same value system to claim legitimacy in their present. What are the consequences? 

‘Why are students given deadlines in classrooms when choosing disciplines for attending a classroom? I was given a list of subjects to choose from, and among them I had to choose a few within a stipulated time. Luckily enough I got all which I chose. After a month, I requested to be added in the classroom. Having missed the deadline, I felt shame when I didn't receive the answer to my request on first go for many days. At first, I thought I made a mistake. After I pressed the button second time, I received a reply. It gave me a world of knowledge to ask some new questions. This also got me thinking the same question I asked in my undergraduate college. Unable to skip streams after first year of education, I was told to start afresh in the application process and waste a year. I'm investigating the mind of institutions, especially in higher education since then.’

Assuming that every soul makes the best decision in a given time. The institutions that offer a second lease to life, a chance to grow in multiple directions, a meaningful experience to learn would not have existed. The argument for cross-disciplinary Master’s degree of a student at a later stage of her life wouldn't stick during the SOP process in a reputed University. Arbitrariness of a deadline could go to any length. Some questions that can be asked for Ex: Why didn't she choose 'better' when she was 21? (Hence refusing the admission itself) Why do masters twice? Why become an economist after studying Physics? (Hence refusing the admission again) Where is the boundary? Who gets to decide? Based on what justifications?

It is self-evident that the best education is attained with agile systems. When institutions have deadlines to sign up for signing up for classrooms, what value do they espouse to begin with? It is a natural right of every student in an institutions to attain her highest potential by virtue of existence in that institution. While most institutions functions on the norms of efficiency, educational institutions could be omitted from that paradigm.

It could be that efficiency of institutions and fairness on the part students have a deep value rooted in professionalism. Should professionalism be shown at such pivotal moments itself?

Let's look at it on the part of the students. If it is fair to set a deadline for choosing a subject of their choice, then what is the value system of the students? Learning each value system is easily organised by polling system on zoom town halls. Is each student capable of making the best choice as per limited information in that duration? If not then doesn't the institution need a re-look at its value system?

 In Universities where culture building is one of the objectives and creating a diverse space for learning is the goal, assuming that all systems can work with time based singularity is not okay. Is there an argument for a few more cultures that don't rest on temporality? Whether it is unfair or fair, it is in the hands of the institutions to decide. What is the message put out if the institutions are compelled to function within limitations of time? What is the principle in higher education you end up creating for the next generation?

Should the student be stopped from sitting in the classroom because they filled in the application late? If she is stopped, are we truly democratic? Does it build agility in the system? Is the system flexible enough? World-class education needs infusion of modernity, then is it modern enough?

In old days when applications were sent through post, having a deadline would make sense. They would say, "Please send in your letters by post on so and so date and sign up". Signaling that the student must prepare a month in advance for the snail mail to reach its destination. The telephones existed with a privileged few. Communication wasn't available at a click. Today, we have email and technology. Applications that work as assistants. The last minute addition of a student to the classroom shouldn't be an issue.

If a student isn't allowed to sit for a classroom when the teacher has no issue, doesn't the system itself become more bureaucratic and rigid in the modern era? When we are trying to change paradigms, the inherited process is sending a different signal. What is the future of modern educational institutions?

Is there a problem in Design or by Design?

 

PS: This is an evolving thought, more dialogue to follow. This is an issue we can look into. This is a conversation we have not begun.

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Phone Call

Tring ! Tring ! After 2 seconds ... Tring ! Tring ! Tring ! The phone rang loudly but nobody picked it up. It had been lying like it had been last night. Alone, cold on the floor above the mattresses spread for a man to sleep. The man was the father. A father of two people both in adulthood, with a son and a daughter. The children and their mother and father all lived in a two bed room apartment. The apartment also has a kitchen, two balconies a staircase to lead any visitor up on to the terrace and down towards the ground floor. The phone in its standby mode lay peacefully in bliss on the third and top most floor of an establishment which is over 20 years old. It was bought after a lot of hard work and planning by the father to give a home to his two adolescents and more space to grow up. This home was not just a home. Although it was small but it saw a lot of developments in peoples lives. With people living in it and outside and using it to their fullest extent with cre...
Post a Comment
Read more

Latest Read : Upside of Irrationality

Our brain has wonderful way by which it constantly evolves along the way devising ways to leave us astray. At times it tries teaching something to us. We all usually busy in our world, decide against its meaningful advices and encroach upon 'decisions' we deem fit. What we never discover is the source of errors in judgement. Subconscious knows all and decides to inform at appropriate timing what we seek to accomplish. But gut and intuition (which at time prove to be wrong) come in between claiming everything. If we win, we call it glory, if not,  it is termed as a mistake. But  fellows. It is not our decisions over which we so easily lay claim upon that make us win. On the other hand it is the subconscious. While executing pre -ecided actions we choose to listen (best thing to do!)  all that our subconscious has clammed up in the past. That usually makes us execute our plans with a promise of success or at least save as from a nasty debacle. Everyday while we are b...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Shit Hits The Fan

  2021 December Shit hit the fan and I was left to clean it up. I failed in writing my response papers at my fellowship. I failed to respect the idea of novelty in the subject. I failed to create the make sense of the time that was given to me. I narrated the story that I had come with. That I knew what I wanted, that what I wanted was exactly same as what I needed. It is the novelty of the newness. Most thing get ignored when only some needs to be focused. Please get out of my head, the irritation persisted. I am not in a frame of mind, I would say, like I would say to my mother, who would barge into my room to ask something. The thought that I had not failed loomed constantly, I would reassure myself again and again, that I was okay. Nothing was.   15 people in my family had passed through covid-19. More than 6 were in hospital during the festival of Diwali. I had visited none, not even once did I visit them to ask. That was not the worst part. I couldn’t accept, I...
Post a Comment
Read more